Home Committees Constitution Join Us Press Releases FAQ Magazine Contact Us


Why Lydd Airport Action Group (LAAG) is Opposed to the Large Scale
Development of Lydd Airport

Lydd Airport is proposing to become a regional airport to cater for 2million passengers per annum (mppa) by 2015. The airport has submitted two planning applications for the first phase of this development - one to extend its runway by 444m with an Environmental Statement (ES) based on passenger numbers of 300,000per annum, and the other for a new terminal with an ES based on 500,000 passengers per annum.

LAAG is vigorously opposed to the expansion for the following reasons:

(1) There is no case for a second regional airport in Kent as Kent already has Manston Airport - a large, underutilised regional airport with one of the largest runways in the UK supported by superior road and rail infrastructure.

(2) Lydd Airport is surrounded by protected habitats designated under UK and European laws, reflecting the unique nature of the Dungeness shingle peninsular. In addition to the new and recently enlarged Dungeness, Romney Marsh and Rye Bay, Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) there are three European designations - a Special Area of Conservation (SAC), a Special Protection Area (SPA) and a proposed RAMSAR site. The land also supports an important RSPB bird reserve. The runway extension and safety margins will directly impinge on the SSSI and SAC while the Dungeness area at large will be affected by noise, disturbance and air pollution leading to the loss of rare species and the reduction in the ecological significance of the area.

(3) The airport will be solely served by road. The road infrastructure in the Romney Marsh area and in East Sussex is poor and is already struggling to cope with the existing flow of traffic - bottlenecks occur at Junction 10 of the M20 in Kent and on the A259 at Rye in East Sussex.

(4) There is a serious public safety issue associated with this development. Large 70 tonne jets such as the Boeing 737 will be taking off and landing within 3 miles of the Dungeness nuclear complex which means the risk of crash damage will be high. The nuclear safety consultant, John Large, believes that the existing Dungeness A and B nuclear power stations are vulnerable to aircraft crash damage with the potential for radioactive release.

(5) Dungeness is under the main migratory bird route in the South of England so that the risk of bird strike is high. Birds feed in the area on route to other destinations and the water on either side of the Lydd/Dungeness road attracts substantial numbers of large water birds.

(6) Low cost airlines lead to direct employment of around 300 people per million passengers carried, not the figure of 600 per million passengers projected by the Lydd Airport’s management and the numbers will continue to decline with advances in technology. This is a gross figure and takes no account of the loss of employment caused by the growth of the airport, particularly in the tourist industry along the coast of Romney Marsh.

(7) Lydd Airport’s ambition to become a regional airport will jeopardise the planning application for Dungeness C. If a regional airport is established the frequent movement of large jets and numbers of people in the area will make the case for establishing a new nuclear power station tenuous, thus jeopardising the one source of high quality employment on Romney Marsh.

Louise Barton
Lydd Airport Action Group
www.lyddairportaction.co.uk

 

Article from Go Folkestone Newsletter June 2007

 

More Articles

 

Home  :  Committees  :  Constitution  :  Join Us  :  Press Releases  :  FAQ  :  Links  :  Magazine  :  Contact Us


Sytec Web Design Folkestone Kent


Site Map